‘Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in connection with a $130,000 payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, made shortly before the 2016 election. Prosecutors have said the payment was intended to keep her quiet about a sexual encounter she says she had with Trump years earlier. Prosecutors said Trump’s
“They tried to destroy me,” Kelly said of the harrowing time during an interview with Frontline. “I was just doing my job as a reporter. But the way Trump sees media, the way he sees life, is all, ‘They like me, or they don’t like me,’” Kelly says in a preview of the documentary, released Friday.
Megyn Kelly: why ask this question? Read More »
Was Trump, as a client, aware of what Cohen was really up to? Cohen said he created a shell company called Essential Consultants to pay Daniels and hide the deal from his wife, according to Forbes. The question is why. Is there any other reason for why Cohen pays Daniels $130,000? A sexual encounter with Trump that according to
Burning question: why was Cohen hiding a deal from his wife? Read More »
Caroll v. Trump. The justice system ensures that every individual receives a fair trial regardless of political affiliation. This is based on the principle of impartiality, which means that judges, lawyers, and jury members are expected to set aside their personal beliefs and biases when making decisions related to a case. The Reality of Human
The Human Element in Trump’s case in the Justice System Read More »
From a Moment to a Movement: The Sentence that Sparked Controversy Honest, hardworking President Trump; a target of Smear Campaigns? It started with Megyn Kelly questioning him based on a 15 seconds sentence repeated by Trump. The Apprentice TV series had 14 seasons and totalled 15,180 minutes. Then Pandora’s Box opened with series of accusations
Trump v. Megyn Kelly: the start of a Smear Campaign? Read More »
The Importance of Choosing Wisely. Lawyers can be your saviors or your undoing. Lawyers play a pivotal role in the legal system and source legal admin, and their impact on cases can be profound. They can guide their clients through complex legal source administrative mazes, offering protection and advocacy. A skilled lawyer can defend a client’s rights, challenge unjust
The Lawyer’s Role: Protector or Vulture? Read More »
DNA evidence is commonly perceived as conclusive in legal disputes, particularly criminal cases. Yet, it’s possible for such evidence to be misinterpreted. Consider a scenario where someone alleges possession of a celebrity’s DNA on their garment after an incidental meeting. DNA on clothing doesn’t confirm a criminal act; it only indicates that some form of
The Implications of DNA Evidence Read More »
Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States, has always been a lightning rod for controversy. From his reality TV days to his tumultuous presidency, every move he made was microscopically scrutinized. One particular episode was the Stormy Daniels affair? A sexual encounter that has become emblematic of how a seemingly minor issue can snowball into a legal
The Trump Hush Money Saga: When a Nonexistent Problem Becomes a Mountain Read More »
The Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas case in 1991 led to Bush sanctioning a bill where victims of sexual assault, etc. have the right to seek compensation for damages, etc. Within a year these complaints skyrocketed! In 1991, a young African-American law professor named Anita Hill stepped into the national spotlight and forever altered the landscape of
Anita Hill: The Catalyst of Change in Women’s Rights to Restitution Read More »
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, a seasoned jurist, stands at the intersection of law and life—a native New Yorker whose footsteps echo through the boroughs. Born in Staten Island in 1944, his journey weaves through courtrooms, precedent, and the pulse of the city. Early Roots Legal Pathways: Phillip Morris and Beyond: Donald Trump: Judge Kaplan: The Unseen Encounters As
Kaplan & Trump, Parallel Lives? Read More »