Trump

transactional gratitude misuse

Cohen’s Power Play? An attempt at Transactional Gratitude..

The so-called self-proclaimed ‘fixer’ of Trump, Cohen fell for Stormy Daniels’ script and powerful narration, which made her story come alive by creating vivid and believable incidents. That involved detailed descriptions and realistic dialogue between her and Trump. The more relatable and tangible these incidents were, the more Cohen got immersed in them and fell for […]

Cohen’s Power Play? An attempt at Transactional Gratitude.. Read More »

Compelling storytelling

Stormy Daniels’ Spell? Cohen believed Without Questioning?

According to Cohen, the so-called self-proclaimed ‘fixer’ of Trump, he has averted a major “biblical-level sex scandal” of the century. Unfortunately, he does not realize that all signs show that Stormy Daniels’ story is a figment of her imagination with a major loophole. And evidence shows Trump never had sex with her! Ms Hicks said that while Cohen was not involved

Stormy Daniels’ Spell? Cohen believed Without Questioning? Read More »

Power of association

Power by Association: An Unseen Influence!

Misused by Cohen? Introduction ‘Power by Association’ is a centuries-old concept. It refers to the influence and advantages one can gain through connections or associations with influential people. This power can manifest in various forms, such as career opportunities, business success, and social status, etc.  The Concept of Power by Association The idea behind ‘Power

Power by Association: An Unseen Influence! Read More »

creative-scene-writing

Daniels’ Creativity? The Impact of Imaginative Storytelling

‘She became a pornographic actress in her early twenties, and, soon thereafter, became a screenwriter and director of adult films—a rarity for a woman at the time. In 2002, she started performing in Wicked Pictures productions, becoming one of the studio’s contract stars, and later expanded her reach by writing and directing films for the

Daniels’ Creativity? The Impact of Imaginative Storytelling Read More »

Court testimony

“Daniels’ Perjury? Plot holes in the testimony?”

Extract from Daniels testimony: ‘When they met up later in his suite, she appreciated that he seemed interested in the business aspects of the industry rather than the “sexy stuff.” He also suggested putting her on his TV show, “The Apprentice,” a possibility she hoped could help establish her as a writer and director. She left to use the bathroom and

“Daniels’ Perjury? Plot holes in the testimony?” Read More »

Scorned Daniels vs. Marla Maple: who do you believe?

“Best Sex I’ve Ever Had” appeared on the front page of the New York Post on February 16, 1990. The headline is purportedly a quote from  Marla Maple who would become the second wife of businessman Trump. Prior to the publication of Brooke’s 2018 article, the New York Post reporter Bill Hoffmann had reported that the story had derived from his interview

Scorned Daniels vs. Marla Maple: who do you believe? Read More »

“Cohen’s Illusion of Indispensability: Hicks Unveils the ‘Fixer’s’ Game”

Throughout her testimony, even when detailing behind-the-scenes responses to damaging news, Ms Hicks often spoke positively about her former boss. She reserved her harshest assessments for Cohen. Asked if she would agree that Cohen would protect Mr Trump out of the “kindness of his heart”, as the former president had claimed, Ms Hicks replied: “That

“Cohen’s Illusion of Indispensability: Hicks Unveils the ‘Fixer’s’ Game” Read More »

Muzzled?

“Muzzling the Accused: A Judicial Overstep Against the First Amendment?”

Two fundamental rights often come into play in a legal trial —the right to a fair trial and the right to freedom of speech. Striking the right balance between these two rights is a complex task that courts often grapple with. The Right to a Fair Trial The right to a fair trial is a cornerstone

“Muzzling the Accused: A Judicial Overstep Against the First Amendment?” Read More »

Vultures: Cohen vs. Avenatti at the cost of Trump

Cohen/Avenatti: “Opportunistic Vultures at the Cost of Trump”?

Cohen, a professional lawyer, offered his services to the Trump organization and was paid for his services.  Embezzlement: embezzlement involves misappropriating company funds or assets for personal use. Employees who embezzle funds from their employer for personal financial gain violate trust and ethical norms. Here, Cohen, as a lawyer, was paid by the Trump corporation.

Cohen/Avenatti: “Opportunistic Vultures at the Cost of Trump”? Read More »